Sunday, February 10, 2008
Why Liberalism Doesn't Work On Social Conservatives?
It has been a long known fact that in any society you have had those who simply don't understand the concept of their own person contribution. They scream freedom... but it isn't freedom for such noble things as living and pursuing a productive life as a member of that society, it is usually based on endlessly narcissistic and vain machinations based on their individual perspectives - which are visceral, b aser... and flat out sensual by nature, e.g. homosexual behavior, lesbian behavior, indulging relativism as a means to justify it all along a list of sophic indigences and inflammatory rhetoric espousing some of the most radical abasement of common sense the human mind can conceive - all in the name of attempting to escape the conviction of their folly.
"... relativism is for physics, not for ethics" - Albert Einstein
The post modern education system told us that nothing was relevant but what we felt, that is a lie... apparently it is not. The therapeutic system in place now says, well it isn't your fault, there must be some repressive social pressure causing the problem, so... there it is - it's societies fault and not that of your own. Now this system only works if there is no system of internal accountability. Without a system of balanced, principled ethics and morays to give light to one's personal constitution, the social liberal ends up with a system of self valued behavior, in other words, smelling their own fumes. The "A" word for short... is a system of liberal thought applied to a complex of personal governance illiterated to us from Voltaire and Russo's Humanistic rabble, or Bertrand Russell's philandering antics down to Darwin's rage induced theories interpreted by and expounded on by elements useful to Karl Marx, or even more contemporary voices such as Barton, Sanger or in psychology such as Maslov or Skinner.
These voices have worked to not only to silence principled basis for an internal system of accountability - they mock and reduce the overall validity of the merits of Bible based principles or just simple moral awareness. Yet this social voice in politics seems to feel they have the answers for social conservatives as well? The reality is absurd, completely. To somehow espouse the notion that social and moral renegades can serve the same social interests [and here is the kicker] achieve the same results - knowing you aren't living right... How can you represent the voice of those who are producing the visible results of right living? Not saying that social conservatives are perfect...
But they didn't start a civil war of social dissidence based on moral incorrectness, and other self serving political and social philosophies expedient to their overall agenda. The bottom line is they are radically different and one, in the end, as it is revealing now will prove utterly disastrous.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Gibbons Released: So... Ah, The Lesson On Political Correctness Is?
Fundamental human liberties have always historically been at risk or banished altogether when myopic human machinations are foisted upon a populous rather than the people choosing the change. It is one thing to say a people were or are being oppressed... it is another thing entirely to say they are oppressed by a choice the culture approves of. People never choose to just be oppressed - it occurs when apathy sets in when a perception seeps in that change for the good cannot be had without a price. Now comes the accountability - no social conservative worth their salt will tell you that peace can be had just for the asking. You know - the counsel convenes at the local Starbucks and grand and riveting changes involving the lives those within their grasp are being crafted over a no whip, add shot, extra hot double-venti mocha. Please... if it could all just work out that way huh? Don't even...
She asked for it... she knowingly went to a hostile territory knowing fully of the global climate radical Islam is breeding across the world, particularly if that provence and she is going to go into a classroom and nurture children and coddle them, and tutor them [which is all very fine and well.... ] but, not for once retaining the thought for one second that a) these are very backwards people... their social priorities aren't straight b) She represents western culture.. a threat to radical Mullahs who are looking to oppress people into Sharia law. As long as a person who happens to be Muslim makes a good houly wage, is productive... educated and contributes to the vitality and culture of the land of their domicile - it is a threat to their indoctrination efforts. Don't be fooled by the mainstream media's glasing over this. This woman should be thanking the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob that she was released in one piece. Not the imperatives of appeasement, tolerance and [so-called] acceptance.
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Blind Faith? Romney and Giuliani Studder On Faith Question, Hunter, Thompson and Huckabee Sparkles
FDT edging his RNC rivals just a tad in CNN's attempt at feigning moderation during this debate was something to behold. The former prime time start was alert, focused and on point as he ripped Romney and Giuliani on immigration and Iran. The surprise I have to admit was Mike Huckabee's steadfast answers on his faith. Watching Giuliani and Romney was an exercise in watching I Love Lucy reruns when Ricky catches her in a lie... "well... Ah..." it wasn't a hard question, but yet it snared "I cheated on my wife so I moved in with gays" Giuliani and the most liberal "conservative" candidate on the homosexual issue former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney's position was so ardent, he enacted legislation so liberal and sweeping, the gayest state in the union [ah.. that would be Massachusetts's] voted to not act on legislation he imposed on same-sex marriage. Duncan Hunter was his usual solid self, yet I feel momentum moving away from him, too bad - he's actually the safest bet for the Oval Office. I hope we see a Thompson/Hunter ticket... too much to ask, I guess we'll see.
Hillary was out being booed by Iowan's after reports of a hostage situation by a mentally disturbed person that went well into the next day. The question is , was he "disturbed"? Hillary is being aided in the back drop by Ole Bill expressing his views on the Iraq war but that is anothe blog altogether. Thompson blasted Chris Wallace for having a lack lustre coverage of his campaign over his rivals. He stuck him pretty good... and Fox deserved it. They have been quite pro Romney and Giuliani, one Fox insider was busted recently for an impropriety during this campaign as it is. Murdoch is fooling anyone - He's donated thousands to Hillary's campaign, can't wait to see how that washes when she looses the nod.
Welcome to the American Resistance
Welcome and hang on for the ride!
That Darn Republican